When deer attack: Nara edition

Nara is Kyoto’s slightly less flashy cousin. Nara was the capital of Japan during the (aptly named) Nara period, from A.D. 710 — 780. It’s got some fantasically old and impressive temples, and less tourists milling around than at Kyoto (though that just means merely “heaps” rather than “hordes”).

Nara also has lots of deer. The deer are used to humans, and have learned that humans tend to carry around a lot of food, or at least things that can be eaten. Like delicious cash, or hotel booking confirmations:

"Nom nom nom. May I have your train tickets for dessert?"

Deer can be very cute and innocent-looking. That’s part of what makes them so dangerous:

The real problem comes when you run out of things to feed them. At that point, the deer become very, very grumpy.

The following photo is taken a second before a small child tragically lost her hand in an unprovoked deer attack. Note the evil glint in the perpetrator’s eye:

You start off feeding one deer, and then suddenly it’s a party. And when you run out of food — no joke — they just start biting you. They can also move quite quickly, and they will follow you for a long time unless distracted by an even more tasty looking tourist (Americans proved to be good diversions).

Which is all just a round about way of explaining why Moon Tan looks happy but also slightly concerned in this photo:

Nara: fun but dangerous.

Postscript: having now also met the deer at Miyajima, near Hiroshima, I can tell you that the Miyajima deer are much better behaved. They don’t seem to have acquired a taste for human flesh. The difference seems to be that it’s forbidden to feed the Miyajima deer, so they don’t necessarily expect humans to come bearing snacks. Happily, though, they’re still willing to be patted and photographed. Win!

2 thoughts on “When deer attack: Nara edition

  1. You likely have some home furniture that you just can’t bear to component with, regardless of the dull
    complete on your residence home furnishings. You need to not make
    money choices primarily based on the details offered in this website.
    Sarabeth Asaff has labored in and has penned
    about the residence advancement industry since 1995.

    • it, Americans are a rational loppee that would (almost always) prefer to avoid war and as such, That is exactly how Americans see ourselves but that is not how much of the world sees us. In our minds, we’re the good guys and ostensibly no just nation needs to fear us. Every Presidential administration in my lifetime has bombed or invaded another country. Two of those presidents made the appearance of militarism and a willingness to use violence as a major tool of diplomacy into cornerstones of their time in office. The last president declared DPRK to be one of the US’s greatest enemies. Moreover, the moral arguments notwithstanding, we remain the only nation on Earth to ever deploy nuclear weapons against a foe. It doesn’t matter whether we’re the good guys or not. North Korea has no reason to depend on our good will and our pretenses of morality. We have the capacity to destroy them and we keep intimating that we’ll eventually do so. Of course they want nuclear weapons. If you were an arthritic midget and the champion boxer around the block kept telling everyone how he was going to beat you to death as soon as he got around to it, even if you suspected he was bluffing, you’d probably want a shotgun. It would only be wise.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *